DESIGN OF BHANDEWADI TO KORADI
EFFLUENT TRANSMISSION PIPELINE
INTRODUCTION
Bhandewadi is existing sewage treatment plant at Nagpur owned and
maintained by NMC. Presently it is working with inflow of 70 MLD. It has an
installed capacity of 100 MLD. It is designed for secondary treatment and
effluent is disposed in nearby natural drain after due chlorination. NMC has
now proposed to use this effluent for meeting the requirement of Mahagenco for
its cooling water. NMC and Mahagenco have entered into agreement for such an
arrangement. Installing the pumping system at Bhandewadi, laying the pipeline
from STP to Mahagenco is a combined venture of both NMC and Mahagenco.
Requirement of water for Mahagenco is about 130 MLD for their new plant
coming up and scheduled to commence functioning in 2014. This plant will be of
more modern and using new techniques than the existing one. It will require the
cooling system water of improved quality. Presently, Bhandewadi Sewage
treatment is not delivering the effluent of that standard. Hence, NMC has
planned for two options. In the first option up gradation of the existing
facilities at Bhandewadi STP and to install Tertiary treatment facility. In the
second option NMC plans to create a new STP for North zone and it will have the
capacity another 110+10% MLD.
Mahagenco has total installed capacity of 1100 KW and under expansion programme they have
planned for 3 X 600 KW new plants. These plants will be using new technology
and will require improved quality of water fro cooling towers.
Mahagenco has existing power plant and for the cooling system they are
bringing water from Pench. The use of water in recent years has shown that
demand is about 40 MCUM per annum. It works out to about 110 MLD including the
ash washing activity.
Mahagenco wants that the quality refining for the water shall be as
near to their plant as possible, so that monitoring would be possible easily.
As Mahagenco has decided to utilize the treated waste water from NMC Sewage
treatment plant conveying that treated waste water becomes first task and then
developing tertiary treatment in the premises of Mahagenco becomes additional
task. Final output from the TTP will be equivalent to the requirements of
Mahagenco new plants.
For any Sewage treatment plant the flow pattern will be always changing
and during the daily variations there will be some peaks and some lean periods
and accordingly the output from TTP will be having similar variations. For
getting continuous flow output at defined rate it needs to have an equalization
tank. Mahagenco wants to take up a full day capacity storage to ensure the
reserve as well as daily balancing of flow from the output of TTP.
Chlorination shall be effective in the transit as well as in storage.
For adopting standard practice of chlorination Mahagenco will develop and
maintain the required facilities and appropriate chlorination will be ensured.
Required contact time will be given in the system for effective chlorination.
Dose will be dependent on the quality of incoming waste water. Being open
containers, complete dissolving of chlorine has to be ensured.
Phased planning
Bhandewadi STP is generating 70 MLD of effluent and it is likely to
increase to 110+10% ≤ 130 MLD. Proposed North zone STP with Tertiary treatment
facilities will be on way to Mahagenco and will have the similar capacity of
110+10% ≤ 130 MLD.
Initially it is proposed to use the available capacity of Bhandewadi
STP and pump the effluent from STP to Mahagenco. For this sump and pump house
will have to be constructed at Bhandewadi. The space has been reserved for this
activity by NMC.
There will be a proposed TTP on way for North Zone. Rising main from
Bhandewadi to Mahagenco will have an incoming and outgoing interconnection to
the proposed sump and pump house of TTP. As both the Plants will generate 130
MLD flow in their ultimate stages capacity of rising mains will be 130 MLD.
Presently North zone TTP is in the proposed stage direct Rising main from
Bhandewadi to Mahagenco will also have the capacity of 130 MLD.
Presently it will start from the Bhandewadi STP and hence pumped
treated sewage will be conveyed from Bhandewadi to Koradi. There will be
interconnectivity from and to North zone STP so that the same main will be used
to pump the North zone treated waste water to Koradi. Both these plants will
ensure the total treated sewage flow to Mahagenco of 130 MLD flow. Common
rising main will ensure tapping from Bhandewadi flow or North Zone STP
(proposed ) Flow.
In the first phase however, Bhandewadi STP effluent will be considered
to be conveyed to Mahagenco. As it needs pumping an appropriate capacity
pumping station will be developed in the open space available at STP site.
Conveyance system will be appropriate rising main from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco
via proposed North Zone STP (proposed) site.
Design parameters of Rising Main for phase I
FLow 130 MLD
Bhandewadi G.L. 278.26 m
Mahagenco G.L. 288.15 m
Static head 9.89 m
Length 15131 m
It is proposed to construct a shaft of appropriate height to convert
the rising main into gravity main for having smooth operations. A shaft will
have a rising main at the center and it will go high to the designed level and
effluent will expel into the annular space of the shaft and it will have an
outlet at the bottom of the shaft which will lead to the gravity main.
Hydraulic level will be balanced as per the flow in the shaft annular space and
generate required head for the optimum flow in the gravity main. It will be
never more than the rising main top in the shaft and it will ensure the free
fall. In any case the pump head will be always constant for any combination of
the pumps used. Design of shaft is treated separately. Proposal of shaft will
be operative in the initial stages when the pipe line is bypassing the proposed
North zone TTP. When TTP will come into existence effluent will be pumped from
the sump and pump house at North zone TTP to Mahagenco. In that case the pipe line will again act as
rising main. Static head from North Zone TTP to Mahagenco is more than static
head from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco. It is 288.15 – 263.53 = 24.62 m.
The pipe line proposed is rising main. Hence, standard programme of
economic diameter of rising main is used to arrive at the competitive size. The
programme needs the data to be fed to it in respect of competitive diameters of
pipe line of selected materials. M.S. pipe and HDPE pipes are used as the
competitive materials. For both the pipes rates as per present market rates
have been adopted.
For M.S. pipes, supply rate is further modified to taxes and then to
lowering, laying and jointing cost on kg basis. M.S. pipes are required to be
protected against rusting, both from inside and outside. Such a treatment for
M.S. pipes is normally adopted as Guniting from outside and cement mortar
lining from inside. It has its own limitations. It can not be done in the
factory and it has to be done at site and it remains on the skill of workers.
Further, inside lining can improve the C-value of the pipe line. Cement mortar
lining cannot improve C-value beyond 120. With all these considerations it has
been proposed to use outside and inside coatings with PE/PU which can be done
in the factory and quality lining can be done with minimum thickness 2 mm from
outside and 1 mm from inside. C-value can be assured to be more than 140 and
the life of coatings is also assured to be more than 30 years. Whole of the
pipe line is proposed underground.
Other competitive material for pipe line is HDPE. Approximate diameter
required for the flow under consideration is about 1200 mm diameter. Available
factories in India are manufacturing HDPE pipes and are supported by relevant
ISS. But at present diameters up to 1000 m are supported by ISS. However, for
comparison purposes HDPE pipe with 1200 mm diameter have been considered, for
which rates have been given By M/S. Jain Pipes. They are manufacturing these
pipes as per AWWA standards.
Dia. of pipe in mm
|
Thickness in mm
|
Weight in MT
Per m
|
Rate per MT Ex. Factory
|
Rate with Taxes
|
Rate
per m
|
Rate including PU coating and
lining
LLJT
per m
(6*1.2)
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1000
|
10
|
0.2465
|
5500
|
6500
|
16022
|
19226
|
1000
|
11
|
0.2711
|
5500
|
6500
|
17624
|
21149
|
1100
|
10
|
0.2711
|
5500
|
6500
|
17624
|
21149
|
1100
|
11
|
0.2983
|
5500
|
6500
|
19386
|
23264
|
1200
|
11
|
0.3254
|
5500
|
6500
|
21149
|
25379
|
As far as the diameter is concerned 1200 mm diameter was found to be
appropriate with 10 mm thickness. But it is again subject to modification as it
has to stand the structural analysis of the pipeline in position. Hence,
standard programme was used developed by IWWA for deciding thickness of the
pipeline for various criteria. It was found from the output of 1200 mm dia.
pipe with 10 mm thickness does not stand to some of the criteria. Output is
shown as below,
Above software has been prepared and introduced by Indian Water works
Association and has been adopted for a very long period and is trusted by the
experienced persons and designers. It has all parameters of design inbuilt. It
calculates the structural stability as well minimum thickness of the adopted pipe.
Anything inordinate is shown as reflections in red to correct the appropriate
parameters. Green displays in the windows will ensure the adopted parameter is
satisfactory.
Red figures in the output and also comments in the red indicate to
modify the data to suit the requirement. In this case while changing to the
thickness from 10 mm to 11mm the output gets modified and is as shown below,
With 11 mm thickness other structural features are taken care of and a
completely safe report output is given. There is no red figure nor there any
red comment. Hence, after diameter selection as far flow is concerned thickness
is properly selected. Rate table is accordingly changed for 1200 mm diameter 11
mm thickness.
Regarding the C-value for M.S. pipes it normally ranges for 110 for
bare pipe and 120 for lined pipes. The lining normally adopted is CM lining.
Thickness of lining is normally 12 m to 20 mm. Effective Diameter is net
internal diameter. With 12 mm thickness 1200mm diameter will become 1176 mm for
calculating flow through velocity.
Instead a new type of lining is proposed in this case. It is called as
3LPE/2LPE External and internal HDPE lining. It can be 3LPU/2LPU lining. In the
first case polyethylene is used and in the second case polyurethrene coating
/lining is used. Thickness of lining is maximum 2 mm. It serves as a good
protection to M.S. pipe line and also it adds to C-value which is maintained
always more than 140. Diameter is not much reduced for calculation of flow, and
it has a good serving life at par with design period. This being a new
technology it can ensure smoothness of surface of the M.S. pipeline at par with
nonmetallic plastic pipes. Apart from the strength both in compression and
tension and ruggedness, now M.S. pipes can add a feature of smooth flow of
liquid, in this case, water. Lining is chemical resistant; hence, for effluent
from STP there is full compatibility. The data can be fed in the software for
calculating the economic size of rising main.
HDPE pipe is also treated
as one of the competitor.
Typical Data for HDPE
Resin Grades
|
|
PE 63
|
PE 80
|
PE 100
|
Design stress at 20 degree
centigrade
|
N/sq.mm
|
5
|
6.3
|
8
|
Density
|
kg/cum
|
945-960
|
945-960
|
958-960
|
Melt index (5 kg)
|
g/10 min
|
0.4-0.7
|
0.4-0.7
|
0.4
|
Tensile strength at yield
|
N/ sq.mm
|
20
|
20
|
23
|
Elongation at break
|
%
|
>600
|
>600
|
>600
|
Brittleness temperature
|
deg. Cent.
|
<-70 o:p="">-70>
|
<-70 o:p="">-70>
<-70 o:p="">-70>
Durometer hardness
Shore D
60-65
60-65
60-65
Charpy impact strength
kj/sq.m
No
failure
No
failure
No
failure
Linear expansion
mm/m.deg.c.
0.17
0.17
0.20
Classification of
pipe material
Material grade
|
Minimum required strength in
kg/sq.cm at 20 degree centigrade and 50 years of life
|
Max. allowable stress at
20 degree centigrade
in kg/sq.cm
|
Max. allowable stress at
30 degree centigrade
in kg/sq.cm
|
PE63
|
63
|
50
|
40
|
PE80
|
80
|
63
|
50
|
PE100
|
100
|
80
|
63
|
SDR
= D/T. Where SDR is the standard dimension ratio, Do is the outside diameter of
the pipe and t is the minimum wall thickness.
For
a given pressure rating of the pipe the SDR ratio is constant.
It is now the accepted practice
to talk of the pipes with SDR ratio rather than pressure class, such as PN4,
PN6 etc.
s = P*Do/(2c + p)
s = minimum wall thickness ,mm
P = maximum permissible WP for
the given grade of the material kg/sq.cm = WP at 30 Deg cent* DR factor
Do = Outside Diameter of pipe
in mm
c = specified maximum allowable
hydrostatic design stress for a given temp. and grade of material kg/sq.cm
|
Outside diameter of the pipe
|
1200
|
mm
|
|
Maximum permissible
WP at 30 deg. Cent.
|
6.3
|
kg/sq.cm
|
|
Maximum subjected
Temperature
|
40
|
deg cent
|
(underground)
|
Confrontation to atmosphere
time
|
8760
|
hr/annum
|
|
Expectation of confrontation to
particular degree cent during entire design life 30*1/3
|
10
|
years
|
|
hours in design life
|
87600
|
|
|
Derating factor at 40
deg.cent.
|
0.76
|
|
Refer to graph
|
Effective pressure
|
4.788
|
kg/sq.cm
|
|
c for stress at temp. against
design life
|
4.8
|
N/sq.mm
|
|
|
48
|
kg/sq.cm
|
|
s =
|
57.01
|
mm
|
|
Jain Pipes Ltd. has helped in giving the design of the pipe line. They
have selected PE 100 pipe. They have selected the diameter of 1200 mm O.D.
pipe. They have given the rate of the pipe in their estimate. The same rate has
been adopted in the programme. They have accepted to use the derating
factor as 0.76 for the strength reduction at 40 degree centigrade. SDR
is calculated as above. The calculation has been done according to the
technical catalogue of Godavari HDPE pipes.
Jain Pipes have given design of pipeline into two parts. For Bhandewadi
to North Zone they have proposed PE100 pipes and for the length North zone to
Mahagenco they have proposed PE 80 pipes.
This has been corrected and both the stretches of pipe line have been
retained as PE100. North zone Plant is not yet in existence but it may come up
as TTP in the nearer future. From the sump and Pump house at this TTP effluent
will be pumped to Mahagenco. In fact level difference from North zone to
Mahagenco is more than that from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco.
Output of the economic size of the rising main is shown below. It
indicates that the 1200 mm M.S. Pipe is economical in the design period. It can
serve as rising main and as gravity main as required in the different stages of
design life of the system.
For ascertaining the most economical diameter of the rising main
software has been used which has also been time tested and reliable. It has
been developed by the Mahrashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. Input data is for the
prices of various diameters. Flow for immediate stage and ultimate stages are to be noted. Static
head, rate of unit energy, length of main etc. are additional data to be given.
Software works out capital costs of the pipe material as well as for energy
charges and replacement of pumping machinery etc. and schedules the most
economical version of the alternatives from available diameters and selects for
preference. As it considers total life of the system of pumping and conveyance
the output is more rationalized.
Only drawback of the software is to consider the internal diameter of
the pipeline irrespective of pipe material. Hence, additional data for C-value
is given to calculate net frictional losses and the thickness parameter and
class parameter is converted into the cost for comparison.
On the total considerations the outputs are much reliable and they have
been given as below,
For design of pipe
line flow is considered as 130 MLD.
It is also presumed
that in the initial stages flow will be slowly rising to 130 MLD. For
calculation of the shaft height maximum flow is considered. Shaft will convert
the rising main into gravity main. It can be seen that HGL required for taking
effluent from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco is 309.23 m to give residual head of 5.34
m. In this case as per claim of HDPE pipes and as per the HDPE lining to M.S.
pipes the C-value is taken as 145 instead of 140. It is for the reason that the
height of shaft has to be decided and hence maximum C-value is the parameter.
For basic design of rising main it has been taken as 140. Residual head can be
reduced to 3 m to get the shaft HGL as 307.00 m. Even for this height level
difference from G.L. works out to 307.26 – 278.26 = 29 m.
From
|
To
|
Length
|
Total Load
|
Design Flow
|
Design Flow
|
Dia
|
C-Value
|
Velocity
|
Rate of head loss
|
Head loss
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
m
|
KL
|
MLD
|
lps
|
mm
|
|
m/s
|
m/Km
|
m
|
m
|
SPH
|
BPT
|
30
|
5417
|
130.008
|
1504.72
|
1196
|
145
|
1.34
|
0.946
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BPT
|
Koradi
|
15131
|
5417
|
130.008
|
1504.72
|
1196
|
145
|
1.34
|
0.946
|
14.31
|
15.74
|
GL at start
|
GL at end
|
HGL at start
|
HGL at end
|
efft. Head at start
|
efft. Head at end
|
static head at start
|
static head at end
|
Type of pipe
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
278.26
|
278.26
|
309.26
|
309.23
|
31.00
|
30.97
|
31.00
|
30.97
|
M.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.26
|
288.15
|
309.23
|
293.49
|
30.97
|
5.34
|
30.97
|
5.34
|
M.S.
|
Getting the flow of 130 MLD will be ultimate stage for Bhandewadi. It
will take at least up to 2021 that flow will be generated to this level. Pumping
to this high head will not be justified. Hence, it is assumed that maximum
direct drawl from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco will be considered as 96 MLD. Pumping
machinery can be designed for 96 MLD with a combination of pumps. Selecting 25
MLD pumps 4 working and 2 standby in the initial stages and in the final stages
machinery can be designed and replaced as per the demand of situation. Pump bay
shall be designed to accommodate 8 pumps out of which only 6 pumps can be
installed at present. Head of pumps shall be selected for getting 96 MLD from
Bhandewadi in the initial stages. Losses for carrying 96 MLD through 1200 mm
dia. Pipeline are calculated as below,
Accordingly , after selection of the pipe material, diameter of the
pipe material let the hydraulics decide the economics of the system per a set
of period as the time proceeds and how the situation changes with addition of
new units of TTP, sump and pump house at North Zone plant and new power plant
at Mahagenco.
This design has consideration of the pumping system also.
From
|
To
|
Length
|
Total Load
|
Design Flow
|
Design Flow
|
Dia
|
C-Value
|
Velocity
|
Rate of head loss
|
Head loss
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
m
|
KL
|
MLD
|
lps
|
mm
|
|
m/s
|
m/Km
|
m
|
m
|
SPH
|
BPT
|
30
|
2920
|
70.080
|
811.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.72
|
0.301
|
0.009036
|
0.00994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BPT
|
Koradi
|
15131
|
2920
|
70.080
|
811.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.72
|
0.301
|
4.557413
|
5.01315
|
Initially, when effluent from Bhandewadi is to be conveyed to Mahagenco
it will have flow ranging from 70 MLD to 80 MLd. It will be convenient to pump
the effluent to shaft of about 22 m height by raising HGL to 278.26 m to 300.26
m. Bhandewadi effluent availability will increase to about 96 MLD. And at the
most it be about 110 MLD as its rated capacity. Even then the frictional losses
will be within limits of HGL 300.26 m to run the effluent by gravity to
Mahagenco. As per planning the TTP will expected to come up. Then the situation
will change. Bhandewadi sump R.L. of FSL is 278.26 m and its LSL R.L. will be
273.26 m. About 110 to 130 MLD can flow by gravity to TTP sump through same
pipe line of 1200 mm dia. as the frictional losses are 1.09 m /km. Assuming 130 MLD flow for 6.94 km the losses
will be (1.09*6.94)*1.1 = 8.32 m. Available head at TTP will be 273.26 - 8.32 =
264.94. and 264.94 – 263 53 = 1 .41 m. Similar calculations for 110 MLD flow
show that the available head is (0.699*6.94)*1.1 = 5.34 m, 273.26 – 5.34 =
267.92 m, 267.92 – 263.53 =
4.39 m. For 70 MLD flow the calculations are as below,
GL at start
|
GL at end
|
HGL at start
|
HGL at end
|
efft. Head at start
|
efft. Head at end
|
static head at start
|
static head at end
|
Type of pipe
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
278.26
|
278.26
|
307
|
306.99
|
28.74
|
28.73
|
28.74
|
28.73
|
M.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.26
|
288.15
|
306.99
|
301.98
|
28.73
|
13.83
|
28.73
|
13.83
|
M.S.
|
For 70 MLD flow but with reduced shaft height the calculations are
shown as below,
From
|
To
|
Length
|
Total Load
|
Design Flow
|
Design Flow
|
Dia
|
C-Value
|
Velocity
|
Rate of head loss
|
Head loss
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
m
|
KL
|
MLD
|
lps
|
mm
|
|
m/s
|
m/Km
|
m
|
m
|
SPH
|
BPT
|
30
|
2920
|
70.080
|
811.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.72
|
0.301
|
0.009036
|
0.00994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BPT
|
Koradi
|
15131
|
2920
|
70.080
|
811.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.72
|
0.301
|
4.557413
|
5.01315
|
GL at start
|
GL at end
|
HGL at start
|
HGL at end
|
efft. Head at start
|
efft. Head at end
|
static head at start
|
static head at end
|
Type of pipe
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
278.26
|
278.26
|
297
|
296.99
|
18.74
|
18.73
|
18.74
|
18.73
|
M.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.26
|
288.15
|
296.99
|
291.98
|
18.73
|
3.83
|
18.73
|
3.83
|
M.S.
|
Bhandewadi STP is at present giving 70 MLD effluent. It is expected to
increase to 80 to 85 MLD in the nearer future. However, safe design is
considered as flow will increase to 96 MLD for some duration. Pumps used are
having a discharge capacity of 21.67 MLD each. With normal flow of 80 to 85 MLD
4 pumps will be in operation. In some higher flow condition 5 th pump may be in
operation for small duration. At that time combined flow will be around 96 MLD.
Hence, for this flow shaft height is to be checked. It is proposed to keep it
at 300.00 m . It is expected that Bhandewadi will be able to give this flow as
maximum flow and then for additional demand NZ STP will be developed.
For optimum flow of
96 MLD Shaft level is considered as R.L.300.00
m
From
|
To
|
Length
|
Total Load
|
Design Flow
|
Design Flow
|
Dia
|
C-Value
|
Velocity
|
Rate of head loss
|
Head loss
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
m
|
KL
|
MLD
|
lps
|
mm
|
|
m/s
|
m/Km
|
m
|
m
|
SPH
|
BPT
|
30
|
4000
|
96.000
|
1111.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.99
|
0.539
|
0.016184
|
0.0178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
BPT
|
Koradi
|
15131
|
4000
|
96.000
|
1111.11
|
1196
|
145
|
0.99
|
0.539
|
8.16252
|
8.97877
|
GL at start
|
GL at end
|
HGL at start
|
HGL at end
|
efft. Head at start
|
efft. Head at end
|
static head at start
|
static head at end
|
Type of pipe
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
m
|
|
278.26
|
278.26
|
300
|
299.98
|
21.74
|
21.72
|
21.74
|
21.72
|
M.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.26
|
288.15
|
299.98
|
291.00
|
21.72
|
2.85
|
21.72
|
2.85
|
M.S.
|
Even with this flow
there is a head of 2.85 m at Mahagenco. This is quite safe.
R.L. 300 m has to be
taken for calculating optimum head on pumps.
Minimum water level
adopted in sump is 274.40 m.
Static head 300.00 – 274.40 = 25.40.
Add for frictional
loss and residual head = 2.60 m
Hence, duty point is
28 m for the pumps.
Total height of the
shaft above G.L. 300.00 – 278.26 = 21.74
m.
If there is a flow
minimum one pump to be operative to give 21.67 MLD discharge.
Head loss is 0.57 m. Add for residual head of minimum 1 m.
G.L. at Mahagenco is
288.15 m.
Min.HGL required at
Bhandewadi Shaft for flow of 21.67 MLD is 288.15 + 1.00 +0.57 = 289.72 m.
Hence, shaft will
have LSL of 289.00 m
FSL at
299.00 m
Rising main top R.L. 300.00 m
Free board 2.50 m
Overall height above
G.L. 302.50 – 278.26 = 24.24 m
In case of additional
flow up to 110 MLD structure will be designed accordingly but rising main can
be increased in the shaft when required. At present it will be limited to the
pumps proposed to be provided .
Thus shaft will be a
container 10 m hydraulic depth and dia. as 12 m.
Volume is equal to
1130 Cum.
Overall size will be
dia. 12 m, height of container 13.50 m,
No. of columns 12 + 8 + 1 = 21 No.
Expected bearing
capacity is minimum 15 MT/Sq. m.
Preferable bearing
capacity 20 MT/Sq.m.
Shaft should have
access up to top. Internal RCC staircase to go down to the floor.
Peripherial walkways
at LSL and FSL.
Shaft can be open at
top.
A protective PU
coating shall be given for the water retaining surface with minimum 2LPU 1 mm.
Flow from STP at Bhandewadi will be having a pattern dependent on the
consumption pattern of water by the consumers. It will have peaks in the
morning and also in the evenings. Flow at the night time will be lesser. Hence,
operation of four pumps will be essential according to the flow incoming. It
will also be rationalized slightly by providing sump of minimum 2 hours
capacity to have partial equalization in the sump itself. For having justified
depth in the sump the floor is proposed to be inclined to accommodate lower
flows with better pump-able depths. According to flow variations pump numbers
can be manually or automatically selected. Pumping head is proposed to be
constant up to R.L. 300.00 in the shaft. Further hydraulics after the shaft
will be hydraulically auto-decided in the annular space of the shaft to flow
water from the pumping station site to Mahagenco.
At Mahagenco also, flow pattern will remain the same. Same fluctuations
of flow will be transmitted to Mahagenco and hence, direct utilization of the rated
pumping is not advisable. Instead the storage is required for the quantity
equalization.
Volume of pipe line from Bhandewadi
to Mahagenco for a length of 15131 m and with 1200 mm dia. is a matter
of interest in equalization.
3.14*1.2*1.2*.25*15131 = 17104.08 cum = 17 ML
Initial stage flow 70 MLD = 2.9
ML/hr average.
Assume peak factor as 3
Maximum rate of flow is 3*2.9 = 8.7 ML/ hour
Hence, volume of pipe line is equivalent to balancing of minimum 2
hours.
Shape of the pipeline from Bhandewadi to Mahagenco is in the saucer
shape. It has typical advantages. Line does not get emptyied easily. It remains
full up to R.L. 288.63 m. Water level in the shaft also stabilizes in the
shaft. In no flow conditions, system do
act as a balancing. When the flow starts water initializes as a jump on the
steady surface of the water and energy wave transmits to the far end. When it
accumulates in overcoming the frictional losses I the system flow at the far
end starts. Being in gravity it is a very smooth transition.
No comments:
Post a Comment